It's a stinking shame that we normally find it easier just to argue them into submission, isn't it?
I don't think the answer is simply for them to explain what they feel, because so long as they feel it, the same results will follow. But in conversation feelings are handed back and forth until an intimacy develops, and the other person's concerns become one's own (p. 32).
Labels
- Reading sympathetically
- individual ethics
- making choices
- Common Place
- Glorifying God
- Women's roles
- anxiety
- character of God
- contentment
- control
- death
- enforced community ethics
- erroticism
- faith
- feelings
- gifts and talents
- guilt
- happiness
- human nature
- imitations
- intimacy
- modesty
- penmanship
- pluralistic ignorance
- positivity bias
- providence
- redemption
- redistribution of wealth
- simplicity
- social perception
- spiritual discipline
Sunday, May 15, 2011
A Less Smelly Alternative
From Theodore Zeldin's Conversation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment